Developments in the Law on Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation: Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v AG [2012] SGHC 155; [2013] SGCA 39

When Mr Yaw Shin Leong, MP for Hougang Single Member Constituency (SMC), a Member of Parliament was expelled, an applicant represented by M. Ravi, sought a declaration that the Prime Minister did not have unfettered discretion in deciding whether and when to call a by-election to fill the vacant seat in Parliament, given that art 49(1) of the Constitution provides that “Whenever the seat of a Member, not being a non-constituency Member, has become vacant for any reason other than a dissolution of Parliament, the vacancy shall be filled by election in the manner provided by or under any law relating to Parliamentary elections for the time being in force.” The commentary focuses on this substantive issue rather than the procedural issues and issues of locus standi, which the courts also discussed at length. Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v Attorney-General

SIGN UP FOR MY NEWSLETTER HERE!

Your information will be kept securely and as data privacy laws
will be adhered to, no commercial spamming will occur.

Copyright © 2019 | All Rights Reserved | No content on this website is to be used, downloaded or replicated without permission.
Follow Me
SIGN UP FOR MY NEWSLETTER HERE!

Your information will be kept securely
and as data privacy laws will be adhered
to, no commercial spamming will occur.

Copyright © 2019 | All Rights Reserved
No content on this website is to be used,
downloaded or replicated without permission.