Chee Siok Chin v Minister for Home Affairs – The Right Way to Go?

In this article, the writer compares the approaches taken by the Singapore Court of Appeal and the Malaysian Federal Court as to the permissibility of courts to imply words into their Constitution. While the two cases of Chee Siok Chin v Minister for Home Affairs and Dr Mohd Nasir bin Hashim v Menteri Dalam Negeri Malaysia were essentially interpreting what was on paper similar provisions, the holdings were completely dissimilar. He questions why this was so. Chee Siok Chin v Minister for Home Affairs was argued by M. Ravi in 2005.

SIGN UP FOR MY NEWSLETTER HERE!

Your information will be kept securely and as data privacy laws
will be adhered to, no commercial spamming will occur.

Copyright © 2019 | All Rights Reserved | No content on this website is to be used, downloaded or replicated without permission.
Follow Me
SIGN UP FOR MY NEWSLETTER HERE!

Your information will be kept securely
and as data privacy laws will be adhered
to, no commercial spamming will occur.

Copyright © 2019 | All Rights Reserved
No content on this website is to be used,
downloaded or replicated without permission.